Sadly, I doubt it has anything to do with the developers trying to make things more accessible and more to do with the idea that there is a portion of the userbase that uses the word 'accessiblity' as a weapon.
IE, they will use it, and thus any sort of criticism against their idea is now 'ableist'.
I have seen it in the suggestions forum, where people will argue for having the site basically hand out thousands of treasure a day without the users doing anything (and not just bond all buttons) and call it an 'accessiblity' issue that there is some effort needed to put into the game.
This then results in true accessiblity issues being taken less seriously, because people get so used to accessible being used interchangably with easy.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: New Ancients
(Anonymous) 2023-07-19 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)IE, they will use it, and thus any sort of criticism against their idea is now 'ableist'.
I have seen it in the suggestions forum, where people will argue for having the site basically hand out thousands of treasure a day without the users doing anything (and not just bond all buttons) and call it an 'accessiblity' issue that there is some effort needed to put into the game.
This then results in true accessiblity issues being taken less seriously, because people get so used to accessible being used interchangably with easy.