mindlessflight: (Default)
mindlessflight ([personal profile] mindlessflight) wrote in [community profile] anonrerising2023-01-27 02:32 pm

Hey.

Edit 2/1/2023: A new small guideline that has been added to the rules- please include direct links to profiles, especially if the user in question is being shady, since they go 'invisible' when FR locks/bans them.

(It's not mandatory, but it helps folks get those juicy details.)
 

Re: Curious about dominance battle wording

(Anonymous) 2023-03-23 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)
SA

sorry, to clarify a bit, im sure there are other flights that are interested in IF data in similar ways that i see lighting track. ive just only been in lightning so its always interesting/surprising to hear that some other flights handle dom differently. i also am genuinely sorry if any of my earlier comments came across as rude, i struggle with tone sometimes.

Re: Curious about dominance battle wording

(Anonymous) 2023-03-23 06:04 pm (UTC)(link)
AYRT

totally understandable, I think it was just this line that came across as teachy:

"its often very valuable for improving the dom experience and maturity for the flight"

you're def right, collecting all these stats is def a good thing! I'm really glad to hear that lightning is doing well - y'all did great against wind and I'm looking forward to seeing how your dom program continues to grow!!

Re: Curious about dominance battle wording

(Anonymous) 2023-03-23 06:16 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

ahh, yeah, im sorry about that - i definitely see how that came across as rude/targeting water and i should have phrased that differently. i'd intended it as a reference to how lightning balances our internal teams and how weve had some new programs/changes following that dom mess in 2020/21. we definitely have a ways to go and it fucking sucked to hear about how ava/rowan behaved behind the scenes but for better or worse it paved the way for a lot of changes that i think have been healthy to our own dom scene.