There's plenty of older Disney shit that now is either unavailable or has warnings tacked of because it's no longer suitable to kids. Disney is not a good choice for that example.
Sorry I wasn't clear, but I was referring back to the "this kind of violence would've been allowed in disney stuff" and people bringing up those disclaimers. Which as you said, are completely irrelevant to this conversation (though I agree that some older disney stuff IS still too dark for kids stuff nowadays)
That was the point I was making. The company that made those movies is even admitting their old shit(where the stuff that user came from would be from) isn't considered kid appropriate. Why is decades old Disney being held up for this?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: Hatchling skin rules revised
(Anonymous) 2024-05-18 05:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Hatchling skin rules revised
(Anonymous) 2024-05-19 03:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Hatchling skin rules revised
(Anonymous) 2024-05-19 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)The old Disney stuff usually has warnings for being racist af, not for whatever you think is edgy about Owl House.
Re: Hatchling skin rules revised
(Anonymous) 2024-05-19 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Hatchling skin rules revised
(Anonymous) 2024-05-19 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)Sorry I wasn't clear, but I was referring back to the "this kind of violence would've been allowed in disney stuff" and people bringing up those disclaimers. Which as you said, are completely irrelevant to this conversation (though I agree that some older disney stuff IS still too dark for kids stuff nowadays)
Re: Hatchling skin rules revised
(Anonymous) 2024-05-20 04:01 am (UTC)(link)