mindlessflight: (Default)
mindlessflight ([personal profile] mindlessflight) wrote in [community profile] anonrerising2023-09-21 01:28 pm

Spooky Spite

An important update:

Due to a specific person being a complete child, comments are going to be screened by default.

This is only temporary, and I apologize for the inconvenience- this is going to be a pain in the ass for me, too, but multiple people have come forward about fears of doxxing, and this is the only way to make sure any doxxing is contained.

(This basically will force the doxxer to make a DW account to post any doxxing attempts unscreened, and will let me more reliably report them to DW staff/authorities.)

Again, I apologize, and will be working to unscreen comments as fast as possible, but I'm only one person.

(Vasemod has had some personal issues come up, so I am the only mod atm. Please bear with me until this bit of annoyance has passed.)

Re: Selling Dragons with AI Art

(Anonymous) 2023-10-26 06:54 am (UTC)(link)
hmm i wonder what i was responding to in that quote

"I’m glad you think art theft is fun (:"

ah yes, i was the passive aggressive one first, my bad! my egotistical ass thought a picture was neat!

???????????????????????

Re: Selling Dragons with AI Art

(Anonymous) 2023-10-26 08:31 am (UTC)(link)
“i think the images are fun” + “for sure, i never disagreed.” in response to “I mean a large chunk of AI models thrive from scraping styles from existing artists, which IS art theft.” = I’m glad you think art theft is fun!

it has been funny to see you run yourself in circles about this and assume every other anon was me tho lmao. I’m not going to try to stop you from thinking AI is fun or try to have a nuanced convo because we clearly both have our own thoughts about it. hope that helps end the discussion??

Re: Selling Dragons with AI Art

(Anonymous) 2023-10-26 09:55 am (UTC)(link)
ok... so imagine you're at a clothing chain store

"i think this shirt is fun" + "for sure, i never disagreed" in response to "I mean a large chunk of off the rack clothing is made by underpaid/child labor" = I'm glad you think underpaid/child labor is fun! is an incredibly extreme and unhuman conversation. i am not buying the child labor shirt or approving of the process by which it came about, i'm commenting specifically on the shirt's visual qualities. if i could live in a world where it didn't exist, i'd be there. alas

i responded to you without making any assumptions who you or any other anon was, i haven't commented on that at all so i'm a little confused what you mean. it's getting late and i'm going to head to bed but i do hope more people talk more in depth about the actual topic of ai art so i can wake up and join in on that instead of this lol

Re: Selling Dragons with AI Art

(Anonymous) 2023-10-26 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
ok, but the original convo was about how ai art is bad. using your metaphor, imagine if people were having a conversation about how a clothing chain store uses child labor, and then someone says "well I think their clothes are fun!" do you understand that that looks really bad? do you understand that seems like a defense of the clothing brand?

Re: Selling Dragons with AI Art

(Anonymous) 2023-10-27 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
i would, except for how i followed it up in that same post by saying that it wasn't, to follow my metaphor, legitimate clothing and that people were rightfully upset about it being used that way. do you understand?