mindlessflight: (Default)
mindlessflight ([personal profile] mindlessflight) wrote in [community profile] anonrerising2023-09-21 01:28 pm

Spooky Spite

An important update:

Due to a specific person being a complete child, comments are going to be screened by default.

This is only temporary, and I apologize for the inconvenience- this is going to be a pain in the ass for me, too, but multiple people have come forward about fears of doxxing, and this is the only way to make sure any doxxing is contained.

(This basically will force the doxxer to make a DW account to post any doxxing attempts unscreened, and will let me more reliably report them to DW staff/authorities.)

Again, I apologize, and will be working to unscreen comments as fast as possible, but I'm only one person.

(Vasemod has had some personal issues come up, so I am the only mod atm. Please bear with me until this bit of annoyance has passed.)

Re: weevil and co

(Anonymous) 2023-09-28 08:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Your proof is literally less than nothing. Actually, it's more damning than anything. And I'm no fan of A.

It does look like an open and shut case of conspiring off site to block evade to buy something from a blocked user with extra steps.

What it sounds like to me for the timeline:

W buys dragon from A, gives to S? a week later. (I'm guessing A had S? blocked.)

A notices this and chooses to block W, which is reasonable. A probably shrugged it off at this point, but it would stick in memory.

W wants dragon A is selling, hands 17K gems to unknown party who bought dragon a few hours later(most likely for that price or less, if there was a payment involved to get the user to break the rules for them.

Unknown party sent dragon A sold to V over a week later(which screams know I'm breaking the rules, so I'm waiting longer this time to finish this so maybe A doesn't see.)

V sends dragon to A's blocked user W within 2 minutes of receiving.

And you still think staff is in the wrong?

This is an open and shut case. And a gratuitous one at that. Ban deserved, sit down and shut up.

Re: weevil and co

(Anonymous) 2023-09-28 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
This isn’t salt mines please type out the names.

Re: weevil and co

(Anonymous) 2023-09-29 02:04 pm (UTC)(link)
+1
I just completely glaze over someone's post as unimportant if they don't use names

Re: weevil and co

(Anonymous) 2023-09-28 10:33 pm (UTC)(link)
i am not the same anon, but my guesses at the usernames from lurking in g1 hell when the bans were discussed
w = weevil
a = alyxandre
v = vynne
s = not sure about this one? eternallysacred is the only one who has the letter s in their name

Re: weevil and co

(Anonymous) 2023-09-28 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
hey yeah please type out the names next time. Reading this quickly became a chore. :(

Re: weevil and co

(Anonymous) 2023-09-29 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not in the discord. I was just going off the image that was linked here and filling in probable details that are how I would, as a logical person, translate what I read here https://archive.ph/le5Il

I know none of these people, and at least some, they had no definite name. And I was too lazy to type out the names that were written. I assumed Alyxandre was [person], so that's A. Weevil is W. Vynne is V. S? is the "Sacred I think" person.

It was a blind summary of what they linked as how I read it to explain how fucking stupid their "evidence" is to anyone not involved.