Honest truth, there are better examples of skin rejections to use than these that I wish they used. Some of these are perfectly reasonable rejections taken independently.
The sexuality ones? The first one ruined all deniability with that name, the second one looks a bit too much like someone has a thing for schoolgirl uniforms. If I wore a skirt that short, you'd see panties.
The gore and suffering examples... Some are kind of stupid rejections, but the lava lamp tube argument seems flimsy to me. And the pearl catcher decorated with slices obviously taken out of her own body... That feels excessively gruesome even without blood. If it'd been my decision, no correction would make that acceptable.
The incense ones, I really thought they were cigarettes when I was pinged for them at first.
Not kissing the staff's ass like I'm sure I'll get accused of, just saying why these ones?
Yeah I think the sexy ones are inappropriate for the site, and it's not really the kind of audience that the staff want to cultivate. Are people trying to think that these kinds of skins should be made acceptable or what?
Bruh not to pass judgement but if you look at an accent for a wildclaw and it's got stockings and you go "yeah that's sexy" that's...kinda a you thing. Personally unless it's blatantly a skin that's got like, idk, bedroom eyes, or is literally lingerie, i'm gonna have to say that no, it's not sexy, it's just a stocking.
At what point do you stop saying that it's in my mind? For example, there have been some vague BDSM themed skins with plausible deniability on the site or people who have tried to get them approved. Are you going to say "It's your fault for making it sexual?"
No, I don't really think the accents are sexually arousing to me, but I understand why the admins are going to not want anything suggestive on their site or encourage people to cultivate that kind of atmosphere.
Fun fact! You yourself don't have to find something sexy to recognize if it's a reference to something that people DO find sexy! Additional fun fact! Stockings can be lingerie! No one's talking about christmas stockings here.
"We do not ask for the rules to be changed. We would like staff to update the on-site skin guide. Rules have clearly changed since it was written and there are VERY minor things that will get a skin 100% denied."
This is on the first post of the thread. They clearly are okay with inappropriate skins being denied, they just want a hard and fast rule about what isn't okay. There's a post later on page 17, I believe, that points out a snapper skin with a full-body schoolgirl in stockings is allowed.
I think that skin is a little different because it's a piece of fake apparel, it's a drawing. No, it's not appropriate either. But maybe someone wasn't paying attention too closely that day and let it slip through. Doesn't make the other ones okay.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-05 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)The sexuality ones? The first one ruined all deniability with that name, the second one looks a bit too much like someone has a thing for schoolgirl uniforms. If I wore a skirt that short, you'd see panties.
The gore and suffering examples... Some are kind of stupid rejections, but the lava lamp tube argument seems flimsy to me. And the pearl catcher decorated with slices obviously taken out of her own body... That feels excessively gruesome even without blood. If it'd been my decision, no correction would make that acceptable.
The incense ones, I really thought they were cigarettes when I was pinged for them at first.
Not kissing the staff's ass like I'm sure I'll get accused of, just saying why these ones?
Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:16 am (UTC)(link)This feels like the corgi vista drama all over again.
Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:46 am (UTC)(link)No, I don't really think the accents are sexually arousing to me, but I understand why the admins are going to not want anything suggestive on their site or encourage people to cultivate that kind of atmosphere.
Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:51 am (UTC)(link)Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-07 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:17 am (UTC)(link)This is on the first post of the thread. They clearly are okay with inappropriate skins being denied, they just want a hard and fast rule about what isn't okay. There's a post later on page 17, I believe, that points out a snapper skin with a full-body schoolgirl in stockings is allowed.
Re: Skin makers go on strike
(Anonymous) 2022-04-06 12:50 am (UTC)(link)https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/frd/3123785/18#post_50872311
I think that skin is a little different because it's a piece of fake apparel, it's a drawing. No, it's not appropriate either. But maybe someone wasn't paying attention too closely that day and let it slip through. Doesn't make the other ones okay.