SA and seeing how many people on this thread seem to be in aaa, wouldn't surprise me if 888 already knew only showing a gun holster was perfectly legal or explained in aaa how the muzzles are the part that's prohibited
I am (albeit not checking too often) in aaa and in my opinion it seemed to me like everyone had more of an attitude of "wow can't believe they caught the IP infringement but allowed the gun", so I do feel like there is some truth in 888 (and let me be clear, *many others as well*, but since 888 is the example here) deliberately testing the rules and bending them as often as possible. I don't know if the whole muzzle context was ever explained since again, I don't check it that often for my own sanity. Similar to how there's a thread earlier in the wanker thread complaining about a red recolor not passing the queue and people pointing out that well yeah, what did you expect, except in this case it's OP complaining about 888 not being caught for that particular issue (yet)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-03-12 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)Re: DA
(Anonymous) 2025-03-12 07:11 pm (UTC)(link)