Re: LGBTQ+ thread

(Anonymous) 2025-02-22 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
Admittedly I only skimmed the thread because I wasn't in a place to give it a proper read. That sucks. I actually did acknowledge that I might've missed that sort of crucial context. I still stand by my statement.

Re: LGBTQ+ thread

(Anonymous) 2025-02-22 05:30 am (UTC)(link)
ok, but the statement you made is irrelevant to the issue. no one here disagrees with you that it is a good thing to help cis people realize there are options other than default settings available to them. trans men are not cis people who need the charity of someone telling them they might actually be a woman.

Re: LGBTQ+ thread

(Anonymous) 2025-02-22 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
I did also say that in my following posts. Why are you here?