mindlessflight (
mindlessflight) wrote in
anonrerising2024-07-28 06:55 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Our Noble ARR

DISCLAIMER: This is not an actual stab at SMR. It's a lighthearted meme.
Rules
Positivity Post
No Dumb Questions Post
Report a Thread
RESKIN
FR Calendar
Flatview
Latest Page
Wanker Thread
Dom Thread
OT Thread
Festival Thread
Rules
Positivity Post
No Dumb Questions Post
Report a Thread
RESKIN
FR Calendar
Flatview
Latest Page
Wanker Thread
Dom Thread
OT Thread
Festival Thread
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-26 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)i believe what they mean is rewards FOR testing, at least i hope it does. if it is what they meant, they're half right: boolean and the beta vista are both retired items for beta testing the site, but they were given after the site was officially released in their 3-day headstart for players who donated during the kickstarter.
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-26 08:58 pm (UTC)(link)where the other anon is especially wrong is that BECAUSE there's an active cash shop in testing, wiping the site before release is going to be precarious. if they do, they burn the players who bought items with RLC. if they don't, the alpha testing players not only have a unreachably significant advantage when testing is over and they move into other testing phases, and also risk players having established themselves so long that they no longer really have to play the site, which kills their metrics and threatens player retention when these established players have way less to do until something new to them happens.
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-26 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)This is not to say that having a RLC shop in alpha is good, it's pretty shady to have such a thing, but they gotta keep the lights on somehow and that's one way to do it.
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-26 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-27 12:17 am (UTC)(link)"All funds raised through this Kickstarter will go towards adding more features, content, and exciting releases, securing Santae’s future for years to come."
but that's also in the same paragraph where they say this:
"Over the past year, I have personally invested over $150,000 into coding, development, marketing, and art. This financial commitment ensures that our talented artists and developers are fairly compensated for their work."
and while i'm sure they could have spent $150k on working on the site over the years they say they've spent developing it (12, i think someone said?) since the assets ARE of good quality (when not taken from other petsites), we know that artists aren't being fairly compensated for the amount of work they're putting in.
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-27 07:14 am (UTC)(link)In this “second” Alpha state, no more items will be wiped.
I should also mention that they have a “first edition” badge for pets that are the first to have that name, if that makes sense. The badge visibility is toggable, and you can still name a pet the same name as a first edition pet name, you just won’t have the badge. but of course players would value first edition pet names more regardless. These “first edition” names will not be wiped before Beta either.
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-27 07:22 am (UTC)(link)Oops one correction, *except Cash Shop items and gifted items, which includes some pet figurines and the retired Alpha items.
Re: Santae Exposé
(Anonymous) 2024-09-27 03:45 pm (UTC)(link)