DA
The artist that I know it happened to was https://www1.flightrising.com/clan-profile/448574
because they talked about it in an FR server. Ambulocetus is a really talented artist and they made a few CAs that do not look like only brush work. I'm inclined to believe them with how sketchy LW has been.
The artist that I know it happened to was https://www1.flightrising.com/clan-profile/448574
because they talked about it in an FR server. Ambulocetus is a really talented artist and they made a few CAs that do not look like only brush work. I'm inclined to believe them with how sketchy LW has been.
i dunno about the tree one, chief. ive played ARK before, and trees absolutely grow from rocks
(joke)
(joke)
i'd prefer if it were just familiars we haven't awakened yet regardless of ownership, but i get why it isn't that way.
SA (I think this means I'm replying to myself?)
Found the thing, Quiche was getting clarification on if they allow brushes with repeating patterns because there's a rule about repeating patterns. So even if the person didn't use a brush it may have also been because of the repeated pattern of the leads (I believe the artist said they drew one layer and then duplicated it to get the affect? So it may have been the repeating pattern and the opportunity to ask about brushes to the higher ups was used. Idk)
Found the thing, Quiche was getting clarification on if they allow brushes with repeating patterns because there's a rule about repeating patterns. So even if the person didn't use a brush it may have also been because of the repeated pattern of the leads (I believe the artist said they drew one layer and then duplicated it to get the affect? So it may have been the repeating pattern and the opportunity to ask about brushes to the higher ups was used. Idk)
ayrt
i actually meant "familiars we havent awakened" i just woke up lol
i actually meant "familiars we havent awakened" i just woke up lol
I found the post on the ca support thread. The repeated pattern of the leaves was why it was sent to the higher ups if I'm reading what Quiche said right. They were checking if it was fine or not for brushes with repeated patterns since there's a rule against repeating patterns(why that would need to be clarified if they already have a rule against repeated patterns in general idk). Whether a brush was used for the ca or not it was probably the best example they had at the time to clarify. I remember it being talked about in lorwolves ca channel but I went to find it again and the artists messages were gone so I've only got everyone else's messages and not the artists to reread. I'm not saying the used a brush or not, but I remember the CA in question and I can see why the staff may have thought it was a brush. It wouldn't have been the first time I've questioned if someone used a brush or not (most of the time it's they drew it once and then copy pasted which has the unfortunate side affect of looking like a brush, which the artist said they made 1 layer and copy and pasted it)
I know you said it was a joke, but take a look through this image search:
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=APwXEdfqQPznCU93Nd6SU9Q6EqGPI1jlxw:1686522230120&q=tree+growing+from+rock&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjkg7rzoLz_AhUummoFHUtGBWYQ0pQJegQICRAB&biw=1908&bih=817&dpr=1
They may not *technically* be actually growing from the rock itself (but somehow getting soil/growing through the rock) but it can certainly look like they are growing from rocks without looking closely.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&sxsrf=APwXEdfqQPznCU93Nd6SU9Q6EqGPI1jlxw:1686522230120&q=tree+growing+from+rock&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjkg7rzoLz_AhUummoFHUtGBWYQ0pQJegQICRAB&biw=1908&bih=817&dpr=1
They may not *technically* be actually growing from the rock itself (but somehow getting soil/growing through the rock) but it can certainly look like they are growing from rocks without looking closely.
yeah but that doesnt explain t he rest of the tree looking like shit ai
AYRT
Never said it did, but one of the criticisms was that a tree was 'growing from a rock'.
Never said it did, but one of the criticisms was that a tree was 'growing from a rock'.
It looks like a new version of Spooge I mean uh Smirch only with even less attention paid to dimensionality. Wrap the effect around feathers and horns? Why bother when you can just lay a windshield splotch across the line art and call it a day?
Reminder that both mods here are cis white Karens who censor comments from transfemme individuals
I’m glad you’re suffering trying to moderate this hellhole :)
I’m glad you’re suffering trying to moderate this hellhole :)
your gender isn't a win button, show proof of unwarranted censoring or gtfo
i mean i agree that the mods here are absolutely atrocious but they seem to quickly hop on trans dick whenever trans people are mentioned so??? could be a front though
Oh look, a wild Karen calling others Karen. The irony 🥹
idk im trans and have never had any my comments screened. sounds like a you problem
anyways how would they even know youre trans lmfao this is an anon comm, stir your shit elsewhere
anyways how would they even know youre trans lmfao this is an anon comm, stir your shit elsewhere
embarrassing that they “fixed” the name of the loch familiar to “lilypad lochness”… which is still incorrect… it’s “locomotive lilypad” now which is good and cute but the fact that they had to change the name twice is not a good look
why did you submit this to both ARR and smr lol
https://saltminerising.tumblr.com/post/719927161636651008/embarrassing-that-they-fixed-the-name-of-the#notes
https://saltminerising.tumblr.com/post/719927161636651008/embarrassing-that-they-fixed-the-name-of-the#notes
I frankly don't see the issue at this point. They made a mistake, fucked up the fix, and went to something they couldn't mess up for the final try.
Bad would have been leaving either of the first two in place.
Bad would have been leaving either of the first two in place.
Give them a break, they could've ignored the complaints altogether, like many other companies do when it comes to things like this.
this is completely false and anyone who believes this really needs to think about what they see.
Was the artist approached first to provide proof that could have avoided this nonsense? Nope. Is the "evidence" concrete? Hardly. Learn what concept art is. It was passed under the table like notes between school kids. Absolutely awful.
Was the artist approached first to provide proof that could have avoided this nonsense? Nope. Is the "evidence" concrete? Hardly. Learn what concept art is. It was passed under the table like notes between school kids. Absolutely awful.
Page 93 of 121
- «
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- 117
- 118
- 119
- 120
- 121
- »
Page 93 of 121