We got another spare inventory crate scam. Trying to sell them for nearly double what they are LAH. If I wasn't a coward, I would call them out. Their also buying broken bottles for 10x less than LAH. https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ibaz/3103277 https://web.archive.org/web/20220212194441/https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ibaz/3103277
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ibaz/3102766 https://imgur.com/RvowuvC (it won't let me archive it yet)
This is just bizarre sales strategy, stacks of 99 for eggs and NotN chests worked, but were slightly more expensive than buying one by one, why do they think double will sell... Their dragon sale prices are even more bizarre or there's something about those dragons that I'm not seeing.
wow I only looked at the first page of sales, then I saw the others. It makes no sense who would pay 1kg for a non g1 double primal. The only ones that might be worth the actual price are the special IDs. Even then those are bred so that would tank their value.
I see them overpricing things in the AH all the time. Isn't this the same person who allegedly sold a lot of wildclaw scrolls for treasure, like 90kg worth of them for less than 500kt, and got gifted the gems back?
That would be the same person yes. They also claim their reason for selling above LAH is "Less work and people will buy it for more then" which, I can safely say being abit of an AH gremlin is very rarely true.
The secret is holding down enter and clicking buy, doubly so if you specify your wanted price range. This has been Vase's AH buying tips of the year ;)
basically, they listed a bunch of NotN chests for an outrageously high price, and they didn't sell bc of the price, and they turned into dust when NotN ended (while still in the AH, resulting in the screencaps above).
They COULD have sold them at a reasonable price, or opened them and sold the eggs they might have gotten, but instead, they were greedy, and ended up with nothing but dust.
Amazing, I've seen the first one but didn't know it happened again. Perfection lmao
20 gems per chest isn't an unreasonable price either, I would be even more amused if this was because so many people recognized their name or straight up had them blocked.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-12 07:55 pm (UTC)(link)https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ibaz/3103277
https://web.archive.org/web/20220212194441/https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ibaz/3103277
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/ibaz/3102766
https://imgur.com/RvowuvC
(it won't let me archive it yet)
Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-12 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-12 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)wow I only looked at the first page of sales, then I saw the others. It makes no sense who would pay 1kg for a non g1 double primal. The only ones that might be worth the actual price are the special IDs. Even then those are bred so that would tank their value.
Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-12 08:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: TrissyCat
They also claim their reason for selling above LAH is "Less work and people will buy it for more then" which, I can safely say being abit of an AH gremlin is very rarely true.
The secret is holding down enter and clicking buy, doubly so if you specify your wanted price range. This has been Vase's AH buying tips of the year ;)
Re: TrissyCat
and they didn't learn, because this was last year:
Dumb ass.
Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-13 06:41 am (UTC)(link)Re: TrissyCat
They COULD have sold them at a reasonable price, or opened them and sold the eggs they might have gotten, but instead, they were greedy, and ended up with nothing but dust.
Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-13 07:31 am (UTC)(link)Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-13 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)20 gems per chest isn't an unreasonable price either, I would be even more amused if this was because so many people recognized their name or straight up had them blocked.
Re: TrissyCat
(Anonymous) 2022-02-13 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)