fyi, being this obtuse about the definition of the word "force" to try and make your argument isn't the least bit convincing, and just makes you sound disingenuous
Just because you don't agree with an argument doesn't mean that someone is obtuse or disingenuous. Is this how you interact with everyone who disagrees with you? Because defaulting to questioning someone's intelligence and integrity just makes you seem like a defensive asshole with no real ability to debate a subject.
psst, not OP, just someone who thought a thing bore pointing out. since you clearly don't want to hear it, have fun with your current conversational style! I'm sure you convince a lot of people this way lmao
Never heard someone criticize someone's "conversational style" before. You are clearly someone who enjoys insulting people instead of engaging in actual constructive debate. You do you, sweetie. :)
Re: N v P "battle terms"
(Anonymous) 2022-03-02 03:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: N v P "battle terms"
(Anonymous) 2022-03-02 06:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: N v P "battle terms"
(Anonymous) 2022-03-02 02:45 pm (UTC)(link)Re: N v P "battle terms"
(Anonymous) 2022-03-02 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)