mindlessflight (
mindlessflight) wrote in
anonrerising2021-10-15 09:06 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
BINGO

Since this post will be current until January, thought I'd be salty/have fun with it. Let's see if we get Bingo, shall we?
Positivity Post
No Dumb Questions Post
Wanker Thread
OT Thread
Flatview
Latest Page
Report a Thread
Rules
Positivity Post
No Dumb Questions Post
Wanker Thread
OT Thread
Flatview
Latest Page
Report a Thread
Rules
Re: The problem with dominance
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 08:14 pm (UTC)(link)Is it fair to implement a system that penalises flights for encouraging active exalting and being well organised? Earth gets more points per dragon purchased, but each point also costs more per person than any other flight.
However, Earth has had one battle in the last few years. The 'dom powerhouse' aspect has little to nothing to do with Earth having greater dom point purchasing power - it's from establishing an exalting culture and having effective support in getting newbies/new joiners into the various aspects. Implementing changes based solely on exalting numbers says 'if you're working too hard, you'll be penalised'.
I am 100% behind the idea of having a system to handle the issue of OOF support. Perhaps something that accounts for what element a dragon came from - basing it on who last held the dragon for over X period of time, or similar. A blanket approach that doesn't distinguish between individual effort and OOF participation? Not cool with me.
Re: The problem with dominance
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)"Fairness" was not present in my original response, if you were talking to me. FR as a site is already dealing with the blanket approach that doesn't distinguish between individual effort and OOF participation, too. That's the scaling algorithm as currently implemented.
I don't envy the coder who has to try to balance this mechanic since it so heavily interacts with the market economy, tbqh.
Re: The problem with dominance
(Anonymous) 2021-10-21 09:29 am (UTC)(link)I know it didn't - that's why I raised it! I figure that a different blanket response with the same fundamental issues isn't really a fix.
Re: The problem with dominance
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)