By their logic, we should be putting notes on dragons that were scattered (tri-color or scatterscroll) as well, or dragons that were breed or gene changed, or whatever. What about all the dragons that got a common-eye vial applied? Should they have been singled out as not natural? Strange how those situations never bothered them before 🤔!
It only bothers them because they have no way to distinguish that 20kg primal g1 they paid too much for vs a pretty gen 1 someone dropped 500k on a vial for.
And there should be no way to distinguish it. I don't want or need that for my pricey pretty eyed buys. They need to get over it.
Personally i'm just grateful that the G1 community hasn't been pushing the "Natural" thing, as far as i can see. I'm in in the community and it already feels exclusionary and stuck up sometimes, it doesn't need another way to be those things lol. I feel like if someone wants to slap (Natural) in their dragons bio they should but the idea as a whole to me is....it feels like just another reason for people to say "my dragon is better than your dragon" and honestly that just makes me tired.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
mindlessflight) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
anonrerising2021-03-30 12:41 pm
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-05-04 03:39 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-05-04 04:07 pm (UTC)(link)And there should be no way to distinguish it. I don't want or need that for my pricey pretty eyed buys. They need to get over it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-05-04 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)