On the same boat as you, anon. Wasn't there a whole discussion about this months back on another server that tried to suggest this 'real ID verification' thing that went down badly? The consensus was that sending literally any type of real ID is dangerous and can be used against the user who sent it, and that the admin would be in real trouble if it was found out that the user who sent it was actually underaged.
It is practically a lose-lose situation. don't put an NSFW channel in an FR Discord server, because it will be linked back to FR, and it goes under FR's TOS. Simple as that.
it might just be me but it seems that the usual posters on SMR as of late has been really unbearable as of late because it seems for them, there can only be one viewpoint and nuance is thrown out the window.
What's funny about that is when this discussion first started, SMR took down the post that everyone used to talk about the issue. Wonder if they'll take down this post too. :P
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
mindlessflight) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
anonrerising2022-08-02 07:34 pm
Re: ID verification
(Anonymous) 2022-09-16 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)It is practically a lose-lose situation. don't put an NSFW channel in an FR Discord server, because it will be linked back to FR, and it goes under FR's TOS. Simple as that.
it might just be me but it seems that the usual posters on SMR as of late has been really unbearable as of late because it seems for them, there can only be one viewpoint and nuance is thrown out the window.
Re: ID verification
(Anonymous) 2022-09-16 08:05 pm (UTC)(link)Re: ID verification
(Anonymous) 2022-09-17 04:09 am (UTC)(link)https://anonrerising.dreamwidth.org/3754.html?thread=3234986#cmt3234986
https://anonrerising.dreamwidth.org/3754.html?thread=3234730#cmt3234730
Re: ID verification
(Anonymous) 2022-09-19 03:31 am (UTC)(link)