Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-05 07:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Anon i dont have any stake in this fight (i think the whole things kinda a nothingburger on both sides tbh) but undel explicitly says "I approved the original familiar" in that link

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 06:37 am (UTC)(link)
She also says "and no, I didn't know what they looked like when I did so." In that same sentence.

Now I don't really care as I haven't been active and thus missed warriors way and didn't know what the fans looked like but I just have to ask.......why approve something she straight up didn't see like....I'm going into game development and I have classes where we are making a game as a team over the semester and I make sure even the smallest of things that change visually gets someone higher up eyes on it and approval before I move on. Mostly because I'm paranoid but also to make sure it still works with the theme/idea. So the whole 'approving without actually laying eyes on it' thing straight up *baffles* me.

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 09:22 am (UTC)(link)
Anon, respectfully... where's your fucking reading comprehension? It's PAINFULLY obvious Undel was referring to not knowing what the REAL LIFE EQUIVALENT looked like, NOT that she approved the familiar "without actually seeing it". I don't care about the battlelisks either way because I don't like the FR Basilisks in general but I WOULD like some of you to use your brain a little.

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Then the sentence is structured wierd because even reading it not at 2 am and half asleep it still reads to me as she didn't look at the familer before approving it *shrug* sorry. I literally haven't actively played fr in a good 2 years outside of occasionally checking. So I literally do not care. But that's how I read that sentence even while wide awake and aware.

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 02:51 pm (UTC)(link)
think this ones on you nonnie, it definitely reads as "i approved the familiar but at the time i didn't know the implications" to me

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 05:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Anon, "respectfully"... it's actually not that obvious at all, her meaning isn't clear. it sounds like she either 1: approved the concept but not the final art bc someone else worked on it or 2: approved the final art but didn't know what real life cockfighting looked like. both are plausible.

in any case, the person who posted the link's point stands: Undel didnt know about real life cockfighting and made the decision herself. it wasn't necessarily a bunch of angry users complaining that led to this change. they probably just brought the issue to her attention.

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not a native English speaker and I got the same meaning as ayrt so I guess, according to you, I'm a dumb fuck, cool. There is no need to be so angry over a trivial misunderstanding.

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 07:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It's really not obvious, kind of like how your comment really isn't respectful.

Re: WW status update

(Anonymous) 2022-09-06 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)
FR users are notorious for their abysmal reading comprehension and their inability to read a whole post. youre fighting a losing battle if you expect otherwise. people are still going "AGILITY WAS REMOVED WHY WAS I DODGED!!!! STAFF LIED" weeks after staff said they temp nerfed high-agility enemies, to name one example.