Re: Fire Dom Tea?

(Anonymous) 2022-08-13 04:45 am (UTC)(link)
have there been any efforts to bring new blood to the dom team or is it hard to become a lead/too cliquey/something? sounds like it's ripe for new people, like lightning went through last year

Re: Fire Dom Tea?

(Anonymous) 2022-08-13 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, maybe? It seems they know people are upset, but there are no new Ashfall Alliance members I think. At least I hope that literally all of our dom heavy people leaving at once (and some likely to not come back) will be a bit of a wake up call.

Then again, can’t change too much right now because the fest is so close, but I’m hoping after something happens.

Re: Fire Dom Tea?

(Anonymous) 2022-08-14 04:59 am (UTC)(link)
Not OP but:


SvF was in no way planned beforehand. Shadow had that particular week announced months beforehand, and then a while before their actual push Fire showed up as a conquest during that week as well.
When approached by the matter, Fire said that they "do this push every year" yet they haven't done a conquest since — and when Earth conquested for the first week of NOTN Fire backed down and did a profit instead.
Back to SvF, Fire also told Shadow they were not even supposed to know about their push, refused to coordinate with their orgs (theme wise and whatnot) if you look at their threads you will see entirely different aesthetics.

Earlier this year there was a ruckus over Mother's Day push. Shadow has without fail done a conquest for mother's day and then... Fire showed up in domwatch again with a conquest planned for the same date.
The fire orgs claimed they did not know about Shadow's annual push — which is funny when you consider the SvF fiasco from years ago. So Shadow had to know about their NOTN push, but they didn't have to know about Shadow's Mother's Day push — which simply sounds like a shit excuse.
They did back down, however, and just did their push at another date, so there was no SvF 2.

Re: FLAMEFORGER FEST TWO OH TWOTWO

(Anonymous) 2022-08-14 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah i noticed that too, and i agree abt the pick. i kinda feel bad for the third person panicking bc of potential accusations lol

Re: FLAMEFORGER FEST TWO OH TWOTWO

(Anonymous) 2022-08-14 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/skin/3158465/4#post_51916489
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/skin/3158465/1#post_51909362
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/skin/3158465/1#post_51909423
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/skin/3158465/11#post_51979343
i think these ones are very cool :)

Re: Blog

(Anonymous) 2022-08-14 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
stg some of these mfs need to actually touch grass (i dont say that lightly) like. please. do something better with your time than giving ppl on the funny dragon site death threats and god forbid: doxxing them

Re: Free stuff is done.

(Anonymous) 2022-08-14 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
im late to this but its rlly nice you decided to do this :)!! ty anon

Nearku/Arc

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 12:43 am (UTC)(link)
Old-ish drama that i just saw on a different site - how the hell is Arc/Nearku still not banned?

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fQzNVtaHCcZEVFeJbY6aLQ0mpIRntCVbiwNDwh0qX5I/edit

Re: Nearku/Arc

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 12:46 am (UTC)(link)
fuck - i mean ACT. Their new username is Act. brb gonna go facepalm somewhere else

Ondrashek06

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 01:47 am (UTC)(link)
https://web.archive.org/web/20220815014404/https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/help/3161134/1

oh this meltdown over trying to have their account locked is oddly cathartic. and looking back on their posts where they claim completely calm responses to their ornery posts are ‘toxic’… good riddance!

Re: Nearku/Arc

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
To answer your question: nobody fucking knows. Staff seems very iffy on banning users with proof of shit like nearkus or others like veyo and faileas.

Re: Ondrashek06

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 02:55 am (UTC)(link)
“I feel I’m not welcome on this website…”

If literally all you do is bitch about other sites, rules, and yell at people giving you answers that aren’t what you want to hear, of fucking course no one’s going to deal with you. What an annoying little git.

Re: Ondrashek06

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 04:28 am (UTC)(link)
Good lord. I love that they're too stupid to get that a GDPR request requires the site to dispose of all data, including the ID used for verification. This is just proving who you are and where you're from to get it wiped out.

Re: FLAMEFORGER FEST TWO OH TWOTWO

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 09:36 am (UTC)(link)
https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/skin/3158465/11#post_51975291

this is another gorgeous entry from RThrax but i am begging them to stop naming their accents in a way that makes me feel like i'm having a stroke

SA

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 02:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Also find it hilarious that staff had to tell people to stop saying they lock accounts on request.

Re: Nearku/Arc

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
FR doesn't really ban for things that take place off site. Most of the evidence against Nearku is screenshots from discord servers, which FR staff truly have no way of 100% confirming that Nearku said those things. It's a pretty good policy to stand behind imo, even if it means that there are a handful of shitters that keep slipping through. Although personally I think nearku should have been banned for those hehe haha i exalted this gen 1 imp jk not really haha are you mad?, shenanigans.

I think the only exception to this rule has been things like Tox and the frtools person.

Re: Nearku/Arc

(Anonymous) 2022-08-15 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
The FRtools person, technically it was on site. It's just it was the script he made scraping images off the site rather than him.

https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 04:11 am (UTC)(link)
Is saltypie coming off as a real asshole to you guys too, or

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
Tbh i got too distracted by the little unrelated slapfight halfway through the thread about whether pinging someone in the suggestions forum was unnacceptably rude to focus on that

The suggestions forums are demented, godbless

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 08:34 am (UTC)(link)
Same.
How about a block ping toggle specifically for suggestions forum, would that take off?
- and so they get distracted for 5 pages.

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 12:38 pm (UTC)(link)
https://web.archive.org/web/20220816123750/https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/3

The direct link to their first post.

(I had to look for it to figure out what you were talking about, OP)

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Kinda just did a in general thing since they've been a asshole on most pages.

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah file me in with the user who was shocked salty said they weren't trying to be rude

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
SA

Naw, I got you, I just had to search for their first post to see where their bs started lol

Re: https://www1.flightrising.com/forums/sug/3158570/1

(Anonymous) 2022-08-16 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)
idgi, salty is expressing similar views to others in the thread, why are they getting singled out?

Page 6 of 43