Something can be misleading without having any malice behind it. You seem to be very kneejerk defensive on this, and I assume it's probably from past drama I missed, but just saying that information is misleading doesn't necessitate that there's some mastermind behind the scenes actively trying to deceive people. Just using poor wording (as is the care here, regardless of whether that's on Dom Watch, the flight heads, or more likely a mix of both) is enough to be misleading, but it's very possible (likely, in fact!) that everyone involved just thought the wording was clear and accurate to what they understood the push to be, and it was only when that got out to people who didn't have prior context ahead of time that it showed that people didn't necessarily have the same understanding as the organizers.

"With" and "Vs" are such a small change that I definitely think there needs to be some more distinction there. I could totally see myself missing that or just thinking it was different wording from a different host.

And before anyone gets preachy at me for "vulture" behaviour or whatever -- I haven't made a single gem off other flights' dom pushes in over 5 years. The only involvement I've had in dom during that time is in donating my own items and funds to dom banks, and before that, my primary involvement was in raffle attending (and occasionally in helping out with organizing). Never has dom been a significant source of my income, and in fact, I tend to be biased in favour of the pushing flights and their dom heads, rather than the people on the outside.