Yeah, that was my bad in phrasing. I'd had a draft that made it clearer before, but it was more than twice as long as the version I ended up settling with in the end (which is already probably still too long, but I'm a mess lol), and in the cutting process I unfortunately cut the part about this comm (and this instance of LW specifically) being pretty good about it (minus a specific singular anon), and that I was talking more broadly about historical trends across multiple launches of different sites and the pitchforks directed to them. I'd thought I had it in multiple places (because half the other stuff I'd cut was repeated multiple times), but it seems not to have survived. My apologies; I really should have double checked and made sure the specificity stayed in. ><
Huh, I hadn't really heard of Clanheart, which kind of surprises me. Might be a good read-up for me someday when I'm bored. Makes sense to be wary of early access (or the FR genre equivalent) games though, so I get that. Thank you for sharing your perspective.
no subject
Huh, I hadn't really heard of Clanheart, which kind of surprises me. Might be a good read-up for me someday when I'm bored. Makes sense to be wary of early access (or the FR genre equivalent) games though, so I get that. Thank you for sharing your perspective.