Someone wrote in
anonrerising
2022-03-02 03:04 am (UTC)
Re: N v P "battle terms"
fyi, being this obtuse about the definition of the word "force" to try and make your argument isn't the least bit convincing, and just makes you sound disingenuous
(
1722 comments
)
Post a comment in response:
From:
Anonymous
(will be screened)
OpenID
(will be screened if not validated)
Identity URL:
Log in?
Dreamwidth account
Account name
Password
Log in?
If you don't have an account you can
create one now
.
Subject
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
Formatting type
Casual HTML
Markdown
Raw HTML
Rich Text Editor
Message
[
Home
|
Post Entry
|
Log in
|
Search
|
Browse Options
|
Site Map
]
Re: N v P "battle terms"