i’m not trying to debate the ‘morality’ of the not quite incest (since debating it is against arr rules anyway), only saying that the entire bio seemed inappropriate for fr. allowing the ‘mate/son’ reference and an adult-hatchling relationship to stay but making them take out the reference to SA is odd, if that’s what happened. though they might have just acted on that part initially because intentionally avoiding the swear filter is explicitly against the rules.
Re: AoiNoRyuu is at it again.
i’m not trying to debate the ‘morality’ of the not quite incest (since debating it is against arr rules anyway), only saying that the entire bio seemed inappropriate for fr. allowing the ‘mate/son’ reference and an adult-hatchling relationship to stay but making them take out the reference to SA is odd, if that’s what happened. though they might have just acted on that part initially because intentionally avoiding the swear filter is explicitly against the rules.