mindlessflight (
mindlessflight) wrote in
anonrerising2023-01-27 02:32 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hey.

(Idk I'm tired.)
Positivity Post
No Dumb Questions Post
Report a Thread
Rules
RESKIN
Flatview
Latest Page
Wanker Thread
Dom Thread
OT Thread
Edit 2/1/2023: A new small guideline that has been added to the rules- please include direct links to profiles, especially if the user in question is being shady, since they go 'invisible' when FR locks/bans them.
(It's not mandatory, but it helps folks get those juicy details.)
(It's not mandatory, but it helps folks get those juicy details.)
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 11:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 01:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)I was thinking how close that is to the Fire festival; also wondering if it's a battle with OOF help or more of an in-flight thing.
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 01:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 05:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)the dom team stuff is so hard to witness. im confident that theres a lot of really passionate and excited dom participants in fire, but if their orgs arent interested in organizing things and are inflexible with funds they're just going to languish. i think it was laivence(?) who made that whole thread around flameforgers outlining all the problems and recommended changes for firedom. it really struck me how the orgs were/are so unwilling to try new things, and i was hopeful that having such an embarrassing callout would be the wakeup call the orgs needed to change things up. i was honestly looking forward to fire v lightning to see if they had made any meaningful changes and if they could hold their own against a somewhat middle-tier dom flight and use their flight size to their advantage but they barely even beat out earth who wasnt even pushing :/ fire members deserve better imo
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 07:32 pm (UTC)(link)honestly I do not think fire dom ever planned to properly battle lightning, given that they didn't even talk to lightning's dom team about pushing the same week. It genuinely seems they were hoping to use their size ratio to push Lightning out of 1st without much effort and it didn't play out as they expected. I really do not know what's up with Fire's dom team, they've historically been the sloppiest and it seems the most inflexible dom org. It's so odd
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-19 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)yeah.... i really want to hope that firedom repeatedly dropping battles onto other flights unannounced has to do with their own incompetence/mismanagement rather than maliciously taking advantage of their smaller size. them repeatedly doing this to shadow raises eyebrows though.
in any case im morbidly curious to see how fire v water goes. waterdom has experienced leads, experienced exalters/event runners, and i assume decent bank numbers. i know im likely going to support whoever has the better raffle/prices, so it might be sink or swim (har har) for fire if they cant fundraise to incentivize OOF support to them instead of water.
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 01:35 am (UTC)(link)I've heard of several people complaining about arcane dom too
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 01:33 am (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 05:38 am (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 05:34 am (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 05:53 am (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)I agree it's weird and not a thing, it's just that Fire literally had no IF conquest stuff either, it was our usual profit push stuff
like, I have no idea how they expected to beat lightning while not doing anything
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)huh, i was surprised that the dom watch thread had nothing for fires push and assumed that they were just keeping all the details in-flight, but youre saying that they had literally nothing planned? no raffle/team events/leaderboards/etc?
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)The only raffle was someone generously raffling a copy of one of their UMAs (for t/g, not level based)
No IF raffle or leaderboard or tracking that I could find anywhere
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)no tracking/leaderboard feels so bizarre, is that common for fires profit pushes? maybe im just a bit ignorant bc i only know how my flights dom works we always have a basic leaderboard, imo it adds some nice competition and i assume is helpful for the orgs to understand their own flights capabilities.
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-21 02:24 am (UTC)(link)honestly I thought we were going to do battle of the forges for in-flight conquest, but.. nope
Just disappointed, might move for a change of scenery
Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-21 01:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-21 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-21 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-21 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-21 19:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-22 16:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-22 19:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-22 19:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-22 20:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-22 20:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 13:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 14:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 15:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 15:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 15:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 17:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 17:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 17:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 18:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 18:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) - 2023-03-23 13:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Curious about dominance battle wording
(Anonymous) 2023-03-20 01:35 pm (UTC)(link)