I get your point and that of those in the thread are objecting; especially given the hyperbolically generous tone, it does seem predatory.
But it's also worth noting that the user is effectively paying a combined 160~g (they pay the initial 80kt cost and then 80g for the chest - also, I don't know when exactly the ratio went back down, but yay for the return of easy math!). And if a given user really has no ability/inclination to earn the initial 80kt for themselves (as strange as that sounds to me, who's been autopiloting through G&G nearly every day for years), I guess they are indeed coming out 80g ahead of where they would have been otherwise.
Including a PSA in their post about the real LAH couldn't hurt, though. Or an alternate offer: "Okay, I'll send you the 80kt to buy a chest for me. Then I'll pay you an additional 80kt for it...which you can put in your vault until next month, and then use to spend to buy another crate to flip for a bigger profit."
Re: Finder77
But it's also worth noting that the user is effectively paying a combined 160~g (they pay the initial 80kt cost and then 80g for the chest - also, I don't know when exactly the ratio went back down, but yay for the return of easy math!). And if a given user really has no ability/inclination to earn the initial 80kt for themselves (as strange as that sounds to me, who's been autopiloting through G&G nearly every day for years), I guess they are indeed coming out 80g ahead of where they would have been otherwise.
Including a PSA in their post about the real LAH couldn't hurt, though. Or an alternate offer: "Okay, I'll send you the 80kt to buy a chest for me. Then I'll pay you an additional 80kt for it...which you can put in your vault until next month, and then use to spend to buy another crate to flip for a bigger profit."