since you're asking me this in (presumably) good faith i will elaborate. i find this format REALLY confusing bc of all the anons and the acronyms and the people piling on me when i was originally (admittedly snarkily) suggesting someone just start their own blog (which would be welcome tbh! it's boring that AR and SMR are the only places to go) are stressing me out.
starting from this thread, i will explain the conversation as i see it: https://anonrerising.dreamwidth.org/3754.html?thread=3240618#cmt3240618
1. the anon asks the anon they're replying to to explain their thoughts on why they dislike SMR. 2. anon #2 posts a detailed explanation of their opinion on how SMR is run, one of the major points being that they dislike the amount of not-salt. 3. i posted that i disagreed and did like the not-salt, and suggested anon #2 either not follow (if they don't like the content) or start their own blog so they can curate it as they see fit. 4. anon #2 thinks my argument "doesn't work" bc they have to wade through not-salt to read salt and bc they think they would have a hard time attracting followers to a new blog. 5. i said that the fact that they have to wade through not-salt is their own issue, meaning it's not something that invalidates my argument that they either stop reading SMR or start their own blog. 6. anon #2 thinks that i meant they shouldn't express opinions on how SMR is run (i think). 7. i said that i do think they can have opinions, but that nothing they've said invalidates my original suggestion to either stop reading or start a new blog.
hope that helps. i'm also getting confused and honestly really upset so i'll probably log off and be right back tomorrow morning bc i'm fucking addicted to drama blogs smh.
Re: Discord Drama! Adult Content Channel Requiring Real ID?
starting from this thread, i will explain the conversation as i see it:
https://anonrerising.dreamwidth.org/3754.html?thread=3240618#cmt3240618
1. the anon asks the anon they're replying to to explain their thoughts on why they dislike SMR.
2. anon #2 posts a detailed explanation of their opinion on how SMR is run, one of the major points being that they dislike the amount of not-salt.
3. i posted that i disagreed and did like the not-salt, and suggested anon #2 either not follow (if they don't like the content) or start their own blog so they can curate it as they see fit.
4. anon #2 thinks my argument "doesn't work" bc they have to wade through not-salt to read salt and bc they think they would have a hard time attracting followers to a new blog.
5. i said that the fact that they have to wade through not-salt is their own issue, meaning it's not something that invalidates my argument that they either stop reading SMR or start their own blog.
6. anon #2 thinks that i meant they shouldn't express opinions on how SMR is run (i think).
7. i said that i do think they can have opinions, but that nothing they've said invalidates my original suggestion to either stop reading or start a new blog.
hope that helps. i'm also getting confused and honestly really upset so i'll probably log off and be right back tomorrow morning bc i'm fucking addicted to drama blogs smh.