Someone wrote in [community profile] anonrerising 2022-01-15 01:39 am (UTC)

Re: Dakkokki

Literal governments have tried this, and come up with the same concerns that are being expressed here.

https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/Onlineageverification/Report/section?id=committees%2Freportrep%2F024436%2F72614
https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2019/oct/16/uk-drops-plans-for-online-pornography-age-verification-system
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/poi3.250

There isn't any benefit to requiring IDs that's not counterbalanced by the privacy concerns, and no one's created a workable system to verify age without them really. Most attempts at this kind of legislation have failed.

You as random individuals are not responsible for ID-based age verification like this. Can't you have done a quick Google on the topic before you tried this? It's really clear you didn't do any due diligence.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting